1.表示祝贺
介绍自己选择大学专业的困惑;
3,请对方给出建议
各档次的给分范围和要求
第五档:(13-15分)能写明全部要点;语言基本无误;行文连贯,表达消楚。
第四档:(10-12分)能写明全部或绝大部分要点;语言有少量错误;行文不够连贯,表达基本清楚
第三档:(7-9分)能写明基本
虽有较多错误,但能基木达意
第二档:(4-6分)能写出部分要点;语言错误多,影响意思表达
第一档:(1-3分}只能写出一两个要点;语言错误很多,只有个别句子正确
写作第二节评分标准
、评分原则
1.本题总分为25分,按
2.评分时,应主要从内
章结构三个方面考虑,具体为
写内容的质盘完整
情境的融洽度
当性和多性。
3)上下文的衔接和全文的连贯性
评分时,应先根据作答的整体倩况确定其所属的档次,然后以该档次的要求来综合衡量,确定或
调整档次,最后给分
4.评分时还应注意
)词数少于120的,扣2分
书写较差以致影响交际的酌情扣分
写和标点符号是写作规范的重要方面评分时应视其对交际的影响程度予以考虑,英美
档次
一刨造了新颖、丰高、合理的内容,高有逻辑性,续写完整,与原文情境融洽度高
使用了多样且怡当的词汇和语法结构,表达流畅,语言错误很少,且完全不影响理
22-25分)解
自然有效地使用了段落间、语句间衔接于段,全文结构清晰,前后呼应,意义连贯
第六档/高;。喳了比较丰富合理的内容比校舂逻辑性,续写比较完整与原文情境融洽度较
18-21分)
使用了比较多样且恰当的词汇和语法结构,表达比较流畅,有个别错误,但不影
比较有效地使用了语可间衔接于段全文结构比较清晰,意义比较连贯
了基本合理
定的逻辑性,续写基本完整,与原文惰境相关
使用了比较恰当的词汇和语法结构,表达方式不够多样性,表达有些许错误,但基
(15-17分)本不影响坦解
便用了语句问衔接手段,全文结构比较清晰,意义比较连贯
创造了基本完整的故事内容,但有的情节不够合理或逻辑性不强,与原文情境基本
第四档
(114分)解
使用了简单的词汇和语法结构,有部分语言错误和不恰当之处,个别部分影响理
有语句衔接的意识,全文结构基本清晰,意义基本连贯
內容和逻辑上有一些重大问題,续写不够完整,与原文有一定程度脱节
(6-10分)
所用的词汇有限,语法结构单调错误较多且比较低级影响理解
末能有效地使用语句间衔接手段,全文结构不够清晰,意义欠连贯
容和逻辑上有较多重大问题,或有部分内容抄白原文,续写不完整,与原文情境
所使用的词丫非常有限,语法结构单调错误极多严重影响理解
几乎没有使用语句问衔接手段,仝文结构不清晰,意义不连贯
为永卖不城太少成这帝以这这内自文或日
高∷英语答案第2页(共4贞)29. What influence does book Tok have
A. TikTok has lost quantities of users
B. The elderly take up childrens books
C. The bookstores change their books accordingly
D. Youths start treasuring their memories of childhood
30. What does the last paragraph mainly tell us about BookTok
A. Its bright future.
B. Its big challenges
C. Its amazing function
D. Its minor disadvantages
31. What is the best title for the text
A Why Book Tok had an effect on bookstores
B. How Book Tok expanded its range of audience
C. Why Book Tok gained popularity among elderly
D. How Book Tok repopularized young adult fiction
People with fewer friends are more likely to attract new friends than people who already
have a wide social circle-but they think the opposite is true, a January study in the Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology found
The study demonstrated what the authors call“ the friend number paradox(悖论),” or the
concept that we think we'll magnetize more friends if we're more popular, but at the same time
are more interested in befriending others if we know their circle is small
The study author Xianchi Dai and colleagues conducted three studies that presented
participants with scenes to assess the difference between what they predicted others would want
in somebody as a friend and what they wanted in a friend The researchers found people want
high-quality relationships-harder to get from someone with lots of friends-but forget that when
guessing what others want in them. They also found they could help correct this difference by
reminding participants that in fact, social butterflies may have less to give
The researchers say people's natural self-centered viewpoint contributes to the"friend
number paradox. That is, we're more likely to put our in this case, false predictions about
高三英语第7页(共12页)
