阅读理解必练01（新高考）
（满分：37.5分，推荐用时：35分钟）
阅读下列短文，从每题所给的A、B、C、D四个选项中选出最佳选项。
A
【来源】浙江省强基联盟2024-2025学年高三12月联考英语试题
Digital Discovery Workshops
PacSci’s Digital Discovery Workshops bring unique science experiences to you on your own schedule. PacSci educators join you live from our Digital Learning Studio to engage learners in STEM concepts through real-time demonstrations, sample close-ups, and interactive software and videos.
Who Are these for
Digital Discovery Workshops are designed for Pre K-12 graders joining from classrooms, after-school settings, library programs, or other community groups.
Costs & Booking
·1 - 99 participants:$250
·100 - 199 participants:$350
·200 - 299 participants:$450
·300+ participants:$550
Qualified low-income schools may receive up to 100% off Digital Discovery Workshops rates. Programs should be booked at least 2 weeks in advance. We book on a rolling calendar year so we can schedule as far in advance as you like!
How They Work
·PacSci educators send you a private Zoom link, or join a virtual platform of your choice.
·PacSci educators guide participants through demonstrations and activities as they facilitate active student participation.
·Each program includes an optional follow-along worksheet, as well as connected extension activities, reading lists, and videos to use before and after the program.
What You Will Need
·One shared device with a large screen and speakers or individual devices
·Internet connection
·Access to your selected virtual platform, such as Zoom
·A webcam and microphone on participant device(s)
·An adult or volunteer must be present to help facilitate
1．What is the aim of the Digital Discovery Workshops
A．To promote digital learning. B．To improve science education.
C．To discover talented learners. D．To enjoy interactive experience.
2．What do we know the Digital Discovery Workshops
A．They always employ famous educators. B．They cover full costs on some conditions.
C．They accept advance booking at any time. D．They are appropriate for university students.
3．What are participants expected to do
A．Share personal devices. B．Access popular platforms.
C．Engage with assistance. D．Take photos via webcams.
B
【来源】江苏省南京市六校联合体2024-2025学年高三上学期11月联考英语试题
One day, my 11-year-old daughter told me that she wanted to return a pair of pants on Amazon. “You need to keep clicking the ‘something else’ button if you want to talk to a real person,” I told her. She followed my word, and after a bit of clicking, she managed to talk to a real person and get the pants returned. In the process, I had the chance to think about what this everyday interaction was teaching my daughter.
I thought about what it meant to constantly ask for “something else”. It’s not only about having a real person to talk with. It’s equally about the quality of our communication. It’s about thinking something, then saying it, and then having another person think and say something back to you. It seems simple and yet it may become the exception, not the rule. In many cases, it already has.
With the “quick responses” at the bottom of Gmail, potential responses often appear right in front of us. “Yes, sure.” “Of course!” or “I got it.” The responses, I’ve noticed, are mostly okay. Sometimes, they’re exactly what I want to say. Occasionally, they’re wildly wrong. At first, I told myself I wouldn’t use those pre-made responses. Soon enough, though, I got in a rush and found they were good.
What would happen if our language got automated in general in this way What if, instead of generating responses, we simply pointed and clicked Choosing a response is a kind of thinking, but it’s far less accurate than the kind needed to generate content. It has to do more with recognizing a “good enough” response. Instead of starting with a blank board, we critique (评判) things. That’s not useless, but it doesn’t replace thinking in a generative way. If kids only critique something, they won’t have original thoughts. They may become great editors, but they’ll likely struggle to create ideas in fresh ways.
There’s no simple solution and certainly no way to turn back the clock on automated talk. Yet, as we move forward, we need to consider carefully how simple changes in communication can have serious effects. If we want to help our kids, the “something else” we searched for — authentic human conversation — should not be the exception, but the rule.
4．What contributes to high-quality communication according to paragraph 2
A．The clear goals. B．The exact expressions.
C．The process of thinking. D．The immediate response.
5．How does the author feel about using the pre-made responses
A．Excited and eager to try them out.
B．Annoyed and not interested in them.
C．Disappointed by their inaccurate suggestions.
D．Unwilling but finally aware of their convenience.
6．What would happen to kids with the automation of language
A．Their creativity will suffer. B．Their critical thinking ability will increase.
C．Their editing skills will hardly improve. D．Their expressions will be more accurate and efficient.
7．What can be the best title for the text
A．My Reflections on Automated Talk B．My Unforgettable Online Return Experience
C．The Art of Guiding Children’s Creativity D．The Benefits of Using Automation in Communication
C
【来源】湖南省部分名校2024-2025学年高三上学期11月期中联合考试英语
The impacts of smoking on the immune system remain long after a smoker’s last smoking, according to a study. The analysis is part of an effort to determine why immune responses vary so widely from person to person. In addition to cigarette smoking, the study found that having a higher-than-average body mass index (体重指数) and having previously been infected with a typical virus called cytomegalovirus (CMV,巨细胞病毒) also affect the immune response.
Biologist Saint-André and her colleagues analysed blood samples and questionnaires collected by the Milieu Intérieur Consortium from 1,000 healthy people who live in Brittany, France. The researchers exposed the blood samples to microorganisms, viruses and so on known to activate the immune system. They then gauged the effect of them on the production of proteins called cytokines (细胞因子) , which regulate the body’s inflammatory (炎症的) responses.
The authors combined these results with information about 136 personal traits drawn from population studies, environmental and clinical data. They found that three factors stood out as having particularly strong associations with cytokine responses: cigarette smoking, body mass index and previous cytomegalovirus infection.
The data on cigarette consumption were particularly striking; the effect of smoking on cytokine responses was as large as the effects of age, sex and genetics. And these effects remained for years after participants had given up cigarettes.
But the study still needs to be repeated to ensure that the results are convincing, says Saint-Andre. And in future, it should include a more diverse group of participants. The team has now expanded their study to include participants from Senegal and Hong Kong, she says. The researchers have also gone back to the original participants, and have collected fresh blood samples from 415 of them 10 years after the original samples were taken.
“It would be valuable to learn more about how smoking influences immune cell function, and, in turn, what the body’s responses to infection are,” says professor Luo. “That could offer valuable insights into the broader health consequences of smoking.”
8．How did the researchers identify the three influencing factors
A．By repeating the study.
B．By contrasting the personal traits.
C．By referring to studies of other fields.
D．By researching up to 136 people.
9．Who might have the worst immune system according to the text
A．Someone who has quit smoking for many years.
B．Someone whose relatives have a smoking habit.
C．Someone who has a below normal body mass index.
D．Someone who lives with a CMV infected person.
10．What did researchers do to ensure the results were CORRECT
A．They invited more participants of the same race.
B．They expanded their research all over the world.
C．They got on well with the original participants.
D．They restudied some original participants years later.
11．What can we know from what Luo said
A．It is useful and valuable to give up smoking.
B．The result of the study is complete.
C．Smoking has something to do with infection.
D．The study aids to learn the effects of smoking.
D
【来源】2025届广东省三校“决胜高考，梦圆乙巳”第一次联合模拟一模英语试题
In the quest to understand and compare the educational paradigms shaping the minds of future generations, researchers have delved into the intricate dynamics of Chinese and Western pedagogical approaches. Today, the discourse on education systems is often framed by ideological debates and cultural perspectives. Yet, a new comprehensive study aims to dissect these systems beyond surface-level observations, exploring the underlying philosophies and their impact on students.
“With the proliferation of educational theories, it is crucial for us to examine the core principles that drive different educational systems,” said Dr. Li Wei, lead author of the study and a professor of comparative education at the University of Beijing. “These systems now influence the lives of millions of students worldwide, and as we increasingly rely on them to shape the minds of our youth, I wanted to know: How do they compare ”
Using a diverse set of educational case studies and outcomes from various countries, Dr. Li and her team scrutinized the effectiveness and philosophical underpinnings of Chinese and Western education systems.
“We were particularly interested in identifying the factors that contribute to the distinct characteristics of each system, such as the emphasis on rote learning in some cultures versus the focus on critical thinking in others,” said Dr. Li.
Their study revealed that the educational outcomes are not solely determined by the amount of content covered but also by the pedagogical approach. Moreover, these systems are biased towards certain types of learners and intellectual development. This is expected since the educational systems are often a reflection of the cultural values and societal expectations of the regions they serve.
What can we learn from the comparative analysis of these educational systems
“A great deal,” Dr. Li explained. “Educational policymakers can use our study to inform the development of curricula that balance the need for knowledge retention with the cultivation of critical thinking skills. To improve the adaptability of educational systems, we can also encourage the incorporation of diverse teaching methods that cater to a range of learning styles.”
12．What do we know about the current state of educational records and observations
A．They are becoming outdated.
B．They are mostly based on theoretical models.
C．They are limited in scope.
D．They are used for comparative analysis.
13．What does Dr. Li’s study focus on
A．Teaching methodologies.
B．Educational infrastructure.
C．Observational data.
D．Student performance metrics.
14．What has led to the differences between the Chinese and Western education systems according to the study
A．Cultural and historical factors.
B．Technological advancements.
C．Economic disparities.
D．Government policies.
15．What is Dr. Li’s suggestion for improving educational systems
A．Integrate more technology into classrooms.
B．Standardize curriculums across different regions.
C．Provide guidance to educators on diverse teaching methods.
D．Focus on a single pedagogical approach for all subjects.
21世纪教育网(www.21cnjy.com)阅读理解必练01（新高考）
（满分：37.5分，推荐用时：35分钟）
阅读下列短文，从每题所给的A、B、C、D四个选项中选出最佳选项。
A
【来源】浙江省强基联盟2024-2025学年高三12月联考英语试题
Digital Discovery Workshops
PacSci’s Digital Discovery Workshops bring unique science experiences to you on your own schedule. PacSci educators join you live from our Digital Learning Studio to engage learners in STEM concepts through real-time demonstrations, sample close-ups, and interactive software and videos.
Who Are these for
Digital Discovery Workshops are designed for Pre K-12 graders joining from classrooms, after-school settings, library programs, or other community groups.
Costs & Booking
·1 - 99 participants:$250
·100 - 199 participants:$350
·200 - 299 participants:$450
·300+ participants:$550
Qualified low-income schools may receive up to 100% off Digital Discovery Workshops rates. Programs should be booked at least 2 weeks in advance. We book on a rolling calendar year so we can schedule as far in advance as you like!
How They Work
·PacSci educators send you a private Zoom link, or join a virtual platform of your choice.
·PacSci educators guide participants through demonstrations and activities as they facilitate active student participation.
·Each program includes an optional follow-along worksheet, as well as connected extension activities, reading lists, and videos to use before and after the program.
What You Will Need
·One shared device with a large screen and speakers or individual devices
·Internet connection
·Access to your selected virtual platform, such as Zoom
·A webcam and microphone on participant device(s)
·An adult or volunteer must be present to help facilitate
1．What is the aim of the Digital Discovery Workshops
A．To promote digital learning. B．To improve science education.
C．To discover talented learners. D．To enjoy interactive experience.
2．What do we know the Digital Discovery Workshops
A．They always employ famous educators. B．They cover full costs on some conditions.
C．They accept advance booking at any time. D．They are appropriate for university students.
3．What are participants expected to do
A．Share personal devices. B．Access popular platforms.
C．Engage with assistance. D．Take photos via webcams.
【答案】1．B 2．B 3．C
【导语】这是一篇应用文。文章主要介绍了PacSci的Digital Discovery Workshops（数字探索工作坊）的相关信息。
1．推理判断题。根据文章第一段“PacSci’s Digital Discovery Workshops bring unique science experiences to you on your own schedule. (PacSci的数字探索工作坊在你自己安排的时间为你带来独特的科学体验。)”可知，数字探索工作坊的目的是提供独特的科学体验，从而改善或提升科学教育。故选B。
2．细节理解题。根据Costs & Booking部分的“Qualified low-income schools may receive up to 100% off Digital Discovery Workshops rates. (符合条件的低收入学校可以获得高达100%的数字探索工作坊费用减免。)”可知，在某些条件下（如低收入学校），数字探索工作坊可以免除全部费用。故选B。
3．细节理解题。根据文章最后一句“An adult or volunteer must be present to help facilitate. (必须有一名成人或志愿者在场协助。)”可知，参与者需要有成人或志愿者的协助来参与活动。故选C。
B
【来源】江苏省南京市六校联合体2024-2025学年高三上学期11月联考英语试题
One day, my 11-year-old daughter told me that she wanted to return a pair of pants on Amazon. “You need to keep clicking the ‘something else’ button if you want to talk to a real person,” I told her. She followed my word, and after a bit of clicking, she managed to talk to a real person and get the pants returned. In the process, I had the chance to think about what this everyday interaction was teaching my daughter.
I thought about what it meant to constantly ask for “something else”. It’s not only about having a real person to talk with. It’s equally about the quality of our communication. It’s about thinking something, then saying it, and then having another person think and say something back to you. It seems simple and yet it may become the exception, not the rule. In many cases, it already has.
With the “quick responses” at the bottom of Gmail, potential responses often appear right in front of us. “Yes, sure.” “Of course!” or “I got it.” The responses, I’ve noticed, are mostly okay. Sometimes, they’re exactly what I want to say. Occasionally, they’re wildly wrong. At first, I told myself I wouldn’t use those pre-made responses. Soon enough, though, I got in a rush and found they were good.
What would happen if our language got automated in general in this way What if, instead of generating responses, we simply pointed and clicked Choosing a response is a kind of thinking, but it’s far less accurate than the kind needed to generate content. It has to do more with recognizing a “good enough” response. Instead of starting with a blank board, we critique (评判) things. That’s not useless, but it doesn’t replace thinking in a generative way. If kids only critique something, they won’t have original thoughts. They may become great editors, but they’ll likely struggle to create ideas in fresh ways.
There’s no simple solution and certainly no way to turn back the clock on automated talk. Yet, as we move forward, we need to consider carefully how simple changes in communication can have serious effects. If we want to help our kids, the “something else” we searched for — authentic human conversation — should not be the exception, but the rule.
4．What contributes to high-quality communication according to paragraph 2
A．The clear goals. B．The exact expressions.
C．The process of thinking. D．The immediate response.
5．How does the author feel about using the pre-made responses
A．Excited and eager to try them out.
B．Annoyed and not interested in them.
C．Disappointed by their inaccurate suggestions.
D．Unwilling but finally aware of their convenience.
6．What would happen to kids with the automation of language
A．Their creativity will suffer. B．Their critical thinking ability will increase.
C．Their editing skills will hardly improve. D．Their expressions will be more accurate and efficient.
7．What can be the best title for the text
A．My Reflections on Automated Talk B．My Unforgettable Online Return Experience
C．The Art of Guiding Children’s Creativity D．The Benefits of Using Automation in Communication
【答案】4．C 5．D 6．A 7．A
【导语】这是一篇夹叙夹议文。文章通过作者女儿对于自动对话的自身经历，表达了对于自动对话的一些看法和观点。
4．细节理解题。根据第二段“I thought about what it meant to constantly ask for “something else”. It’s not only about having a real person to talk with. It’s equally about the quality of our communication. It’s about thinking something, then saying it, and then having another person think and say something back to you.(我思考了不断要求“别的东西”意味着什么。这不仅仅是有一个真正的人可以交谈。这同样关系到我们沟通的质量。它是关于思考一些事情，然后说出来，然后让另一个人思考并回答你一些事情)”可知，思考的过程有助于高质量的沟通。故选C。
5．细节理解题。根据第三段“At first, I told myself I wouldn’t use those pre-made responses. Soon enough, though, I got in a rush and found they were good.(一开始，我告诉自己不要用那些预先准备好的回答。但很快，我急切发现它们很不错)”可知，作者不愿意使用预先准备好的回答，但最终意识到它们的方便。故选D。
6．推理判断题。根据倒数第二段“What would happen if our language got automated in general in this way What if, instead of generating responses, we simply pointed and clicked Choosing a response is a kind of thinking, but it’s far less accurate than the kind needed to generate content. It has to do more with recognizing a “good enough” response. Instead of starting with a blank board, we critique (评判) things. That’s not useless, but it doesn’t replace thinking in a generative way. If kids only critique something, they won’t have original thoughts. They may become great editors, but they’ll likely struggle to create ideas in fresh ways.(如果我们的语言在整体上被自动化了会发生什么？如果我们不是生成回应，而是指向和点击会怎样？选择回应是一种思考方式，但它的准确性远不如生成内容所需的思考方式。它更多地与识别“足够好”的回应有关。而不是从空白的画布开始，我们是在评价事物。这并非毫无用处，但它无法替代以创造性方式进行思考。如果孩子们只进行评价，他们就不会有原创的想法。他们可能会成为出色的编辑，但很可能无法以全新的方式创造想法)”可知，语言自动化的孩子创造力会受到影响。故选A。
7．主旨大意题。根据最后一段“There’s no simple solution and certainly no way to turn back the clock on automated talk. Yet, as we move forward, we need to consider carefully how simple changes in communication can have serious effects. If we want to help our kids, the “something else” we searched for — authentic human conversation — should not be the exception, but the rule.(没有简单的解决方案，当然也没有办法让自动对话时光倒流。然而，在我们前进的过程中，我们需要仔细考虑沟通方面的简单改变会产生怎样严重的影响。如果我们想帮助我们的孩子，我们寻找的“其他东西”——真实的人类对话——不应该是例外，而应该是规则)”结合文章通过作者女儿对于自动对话的自身经历，表达了对于自动对话的一些看法和观点。可知，A选项“我对自动对话的看法”最符合文章标题。故选A。
C
【来源】湖南省部分名校2024-2025学年高三上学期11月期中联合考试英语
The impacts of smoking on the immune system remain long after a smoker’s last smoking, according to a study. The analysis is part of an effort to determine why immune responses vary so widely from person to person. In addition to cigarette smoking, the study found that having a higher-than-average body mass index (体重指数) and having previously been infected with a typical virus called cytomegalovirus (CMV,巨细胞病毒) also affect the immune response.
Biologist Saint-André and her colleagues analysed blood samples and questionnaires collected by the Milieu Intérieur Consortium from 1,000 healthy people who live in Brittany, France. The researchers exposed the blood samples to microorganisms, viruses and so on known to activate the immune system. They then gauged the effect of them on the production of proteins called cytokines (细胞因子) , which regulate the body’s inflammatory (炎症的) responses.
The authors combined these results with information about 136 personal traits drawn from population studies, environmental and clinical data. They found that three factors stood out as having particularly strong associations with cytokine responses: cigarette smoking, body mass index and previous cytomegalovirus infection.
The data on cigarette consumption were particularly striking; the effect of smoking on cytokine responses was as large as the effects of age, sex and genetics. And these effects remained for years after participants had given up cigarettes.
But the study still needs to be repeated to ensure that the results are convincing, says Saint-Andre. And in future, it should include a more diverse group of participants. The team has now expanded their study to include participants from Senegal and Hong Kong, she says. The researchers have also gone back to the original participants, and have collected fresh blood samples from 415 of them 10 years after the original samples were taken.
“It would be valuable to learn more about how smoking influences immune cell function, and, in turn, what the body’s responses to infection are,” says professor Luo. “That could offer valuable insights into the broader health consequences of smoking.”
8．How did the researchers identify the three influencing factors
A．By repeating the study.
B．By contrasting the personal traits.
C．By referring to studies of other fields.
D．By researching up to 136 people.
9．Who might have the worst immune system according to the text
A．Someone who has quit smoking for many years.
B．Someone whose relatives have a smoking habit.
C．Someone who has a below normal body mass index.
D．Someone who lives with a CMV infected person.
10．What did researchers do to ensure the results were CORRECT
A．They invited more participants of the same race.
B．They expanded their research all over the world.
C．They got on well with the original participants.
D．They restudied some original participants years later.
11．What can we know from what Luo said
A．It is useful and valuable to give up smoking.
B．The result of the study is complete.
C．Smoking has something to do with infection.
D．The study aids to learn the effects of smoking.
【答案】8．C 9．A 10．D 11．D
【导语】本文是一篇说明文，主要介绍了研究人员针对免疫细胞功能进行的调查，指出吸烟、体重指数和病毒感染与免疫细胞的反应有着较强的关联性。
8．细节理解题。根据第三段“The authors combined these results with information about 136 personal traits drawn from population studies, environmental and clinical data. They found that three factors stood out as having particularly strong associations with cytokine responses: cigarette smoking, body mass index and previous cytomegalovirus infection.(作者将这些结果与从人口研究、环境和临床数据中提取的136个个人特征的信息相结合。他们发现，有三个因素与细胞因子反应特别密切相关：吸烟、体重指数和既往巨细胞病毒感染)”可知，研究人员将这些结果与来自人口研究、环境和临床数据中提取的136个个人特征的信息相结合，从而发现了这三个影响因素，即通过参考其他领域的研究。故选C。
9．推理判断题。根据第四段“The data on cigarette consumption were particularly striking; the effect of smoking on cytokine responses was as large as the effects of age, sex and genetics. And these effects remained for years after participants had given up cigarettes.(香烟消耗数据尤其引人注目；吸烟对细胞因子反应的影响与年龄、性别和遗传的影响一样大。这些影响在参与者戒烟多年后仍然存在)”可知，吸烟对细胞因子反应的影响在戒烟多年后依然存在，结合第二段中的“They then gauged the effect of them on the production of proteins called cytokines (细胞因子) , which regulate the body’s inflammatory (炎症的) responses.(然后，他们测量了它们对名为细胞因子的蛋白质的生产的影响，细胞因子调节身体的炎症反应)”可推测出，一个戒烟多年的人的细胞因子反应可能最强烈，而细胞因子影响人体免疫，所以免疫力可能最差。故选A。
10．细节理解题。根据第五段中的“But the study still needs to be repeated to ensure that the results are convincing, says Saint-Andre.(但Saint-Andre说，这项研究仍需要重复，以确保结果令人信服)”“The researchers have also gone back to the original participants, and have collected fresh blood samples from 415 of them 10 years after the original samples were taken.(研究人员还回到了最初的参与者那里，并在原始样本采集10年后从其中415人那里收集了新鲜血液样本)”可知，研究人员为了确保结果的可信性，在10年前的参与者身上重新采集了血液样本，重复进行研究。故选D。
11．推理判断题。根据最后一段““It would be valuable to learn more about how smoking influences immune cell function, and, in turn, what the body’s responses to infection are,” says professor Luo. “That could offer valuable insights into the broader health consequences of smoking.”(“更多地了解吸烟如何影响免疫细胞功能，以及身体反过来对感染的反应，将是非常有价值的。”罗说。“这可以为吸烟对更广泛的健康影响提供有价值的见解。”)”可知，罗认为了解吸烟对免疫细胞功能的影响以及身体对感染的反应有助于为吸烟对健康的影响提供有价值的见解，由此可推测出，这项研究有助于了解吸烟的影响。故选D。
D
【来源】2025届广东省三校“决胜高考，梦圆乙巳”第一次联合模拟一模英语试题
In the quest to understand and compare the educational paradigms shaping the minds of future generations, researchers have delved into the intricate dynamics of Chinese and Western pedagogical approaches. Today, the discourse on education systems is often framed by ideological debates and cultural perspectives. Yet, a new comprehensive study aims to dissect these systems beyond surface-level observations, exploring the underlying philosophies and their impact on students.
“With the proliferation of educational theories, it is crucial for us to examine the core principles that drive different educational systems,” said Dr. Li Wei, lead author of the study and a professor of comparative education at the University of Beijing. “These systems now influence the lives of millions of students worldwide, and as we increasingly rely on them to shape the minds of our youth, I wanted to know: How do they compare ”
Using a diverse set of educational case studies and outcomes from various countries, Dr. Li and her team scrutinized the effectiveness and philosophical underpinnings of Chinese and Western education systems.
“We were particularly interested in identifying the factors that contribute to the distinct characteristics of each system, such as the emphasis on rote learning in some cultures versus the focus on critical thinking in others,” said Dr. Li.
Their study revealed that the educational outcomes are not solely determined by the amount of content covered but also by the pedagogical approach. Moreover, these systems are biased towards certain types of learners and intellectual development. This is expected since the educational systems are often a reflection of the cultural values and societal expectations of the regions they serve.
What can we learn from the comparative analysis of these educational systems
“A great deal,” Dr. Li explained. “Educational policymakers can use our study to inform the development of curricula that balance the need for knowledge retention with the cultivation of critical thinking skills. To improve the adaptability of educational systems, we can also encourage the incorporation of diverse teaching methods that cater to a range of learning styles.”
12．What do we know about the current state of educational records and observations
A．They are becoming outdated.
B．They are mostly based on theoretical models.
C．They are limited in scope.
D．They are used for comparative analysis.
13．What does Dr. Li’s study focus on
A．Teaching methodologies.
B．Educational infrastructure.
C．Observational data.
D．Student performance metrics.
14．What has led to the differences between the Chinese and Western education systems according to the study
A．Cultural and historical factors.
B．Technological advancements.
C．Economic disparities.
D．Government policies.
15．What is Dr. Li’s suggestion for improving educational systems
A．Integrate more technology into classrooms.
B．Standardize curriculums across different regions.
C．Provide guidance to educators on diverse teaching methods.
D．Focus on a single pedagogical approach for all subjects.
【答案】12．C 13．A 14．A 15．C
【导语】这是一篇议论文。探讨了中西方教育模式的异同，以及它们对学生的影响。
12．推理判断题。根据第二段“These systems now influence the lives of millions of students worldwide, and as we increasingly rely on them to shape the minds of our youth, I wanted to know: How do they compare ”（“这些系统现在影响着全世界数百万学生的生活，随着我们越来越依赖它们来塑造年轻人的思想，我想知道：它们相比之下如何？”）可知，教育系统现在影响着全世界数百万学生的生活，这限制了教育记录和观察的范围。故选C项。
13．细节理解题。根据文章第三段中的“Using a diverse set of educational case studies and outcomes from various countries, Dr. Li and her team scrutinized the effectiveness and philosophical underpinnings of Chinese and Western education systems.”（李和她的团队使用了来自不同国家的一系列不同的教育案例研究和成果，仔细研究了中国和西方教育体系的有效性和哲学基础。） 可知，李博士的研究专注于教学方法的有效性和哲学基础。故选A项。
14．推理判断题。根据第五段中的“Their study revealed that the educational outcomes are not solely determined by the amount of content covered but also by the pedagogical approach. Moreover, these systems are biased towards certain types of learners and intellectual development. This is expected since the educational systems are often a reflection of the cultural values and societal expectations of the regions they serve.”（他们的研究表明，教育成果不仅取决于所涵盖内容的数量，还取决于教学方法。此外，这些系统偏向于某些类型的学习者和智力发展。这是预料之中的，因为教育制度往往反映了其所服务地区的文化价值和社会期望。） 可知，教育成果不仅由涵盖的内容量决定，还由教学方法决定，这表明中西方教育系统的差异部分是由文化和历史因素造成的。故选A项。
15．推理判断题。根据最后一段中的“To improve the adaptability of educational systems, we can also encourage the incorporation of diverse teaching methods that cater to a range of learning styles.”（为了提高教育系统的适应性，我们还可以鼓励采用多样化的教学方法，以适应不同的学习风格。） 可知，李博士建议为教育工作者提供不同教学方法的指导。故选C项。
21世纪教育网(www.21cnjy.com)
